Skip to main content

Massage Therapy Program

Go Search
MPC
Index A-Z
MPC Bond
Take A Class
Education Center At Marina
  

Senate Bill 731 signed into law by Governor Schwarzenegger Saturday, September 27, 2008. SB 731 was introduced by Senator Oropeza in 2007. The legislation created a private non-profit California Massage Therapy Council (CAMTC) empowered by the State to issue certification to massage professionals using, initially, a two-tier system: a Massage Practitioner level for those with 250 hours of training (the Massage Practitioner level will be phased out December 31, 2015) and a Massage Therapist level for those with 500 hours of training. The certification is “voluntary,” meaning that you can still practice massage without the state-approved certification if you meet local business-licensing requirements, but you must then adhere to onerous municipal codes (if a municipality requires the new certification, it will be mandatory). Click here to view the bill. Click here to read the response of the Associated Bodywork and Massage Professionals.

Under the new law, in order to use the terms such as "CMP," "CMT," "Certified Massage Practitioner," or "Certified Massage Therapist," you must earn the CAMTC certification. Many massage professionals have been using these terms incorrectly for decades, even though there has never been any state-recognized certification in California. However, because of SB 731, use of the terms without CAMTC certification is now a violation of section 17200 of the California Business and Professions Code, and violators can be prosecuted under this code. Please click here for more information about this issue.

Senate Bill 731 is the culmination of a movement in California to institute regulation of massage practitioners at the state level (the State already regulates private massage schools). This movement has been controversial. Some massage industry insiders feel that the bill is based on arbitrary standards that lack supporting evidence. Many people engaged in other types of bodywork have been concerned that the legislation will attempt to regulate them even though they do not practice massage. On the other hand, many practitioners of massage are outraged by the discriminatory and demeaning requirements of some city and county governments, which can include, for example, restrooms and showers, tests for syphilis and gonorrhea, peep holes for law enforcement officers, and keeping doors unlocked to permit law enforcement officers to enter the workplace unannounced. Many of the municipal codes that regulate massage businesses in California were designed to regulate not the legitimate profession of massage therapy but the sex trade (these codes, which may refer to breasts, genitals, drugs and alcohol, are sometimes referred to as “prostitution codes”). Since SB 731 will preempt these local codes, many massage professionals in the state who are subjected to these codes supported the bill.

In 2003, Assembly Member Kehoe introduced Assembly Bill 1388, the purpose of which was to “establish the Board of Massage Therapy in the Department of Consumer Affairs to license and regulate massage therapists, as defined and massage practitioners, as defined.” The bill did not pass. Click here to view the bill.

In 2005, Senator Figueroa introduced Senate Bill 412, which did not pass. Click here to view the bill and information from professional massage organizations whose members would have been subject to the provisions of the bill.