April Brazinsky

"MCCSN is an amazing nursing program. The instructors and staff are amazingly supportive, and excel at helping students achieve their best. I feel confident that the guidance I received, and the knowledge and skills I learned here will help me to succeed as a Registered Nurse."

April Brazinsky
Major: Nursing
Class of 2016

Nursing

ACEN-Seal-Color-Web_SmallThe Maurine Church Coburn School of Nursing at Monterey Peninsula College (MCCSN) offers the associate of science degree leading to RN licensure. The program is offered in partnership with Montage Health. 

The School of Nursing is approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing (BRN),  and is fully accredited by the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN) through 2019.

Comments about the program may be directed to these agencies at the following addresses:

California Board of Registered Nursing    

  • Board of Registered Nursing
    PO Box 944210
    Sacramento, CA 94244-2100  (www.rn.ca.gov)   
  • Phone: (916) 322-3350

ACEN Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing

  • 3343 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 850
  • Atlanta, Georgia 30326.  (www.acenursing.org)        
  • Phone: 404-975-5000

NOTICE:  The Board of Registered Nursing will visit the  Maurine Church Coburn School of Nursing for a scheduled re-approval visit on March 14-16, 2017.  The exit report will be held on March 16th at 1:30 pm in Room NU 101.  The full schedule is available here:

http://www.mpc.edu/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/18443/20?curm=3&cury=2017

 


 

Program Outcomes:   At the end of the program of study at the Maurine Church Coburn School of Nursing, graduates are able to:

  1. collaborate as team members in providing safe and effective health care to individuals in acute, long-term and community-based settings.
  2. coordinate the activities of the interdisciplinary health care team.
  3. advocate on behalf of patients through patient and family teaching. 
  4. direct evidence-based and patient-centered nursing care.
  5. contribute to the profession as responsible members within the discipline of nursing.

important-image

Applicant Update:The application cycle for the class entering Fall 2017 is now closed.  Phase 2 letters were mailed on April 19th.  Please contact the nursing office if you have not received your response by April 25th.

RESULT SUMMARY:

The Phase 2 score  is the sum of  points added from ATI TEAS results to the Phase 1 score. There were 51 qualified applications after Phase 2.  Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for the applicant pool was 75 points (out of a possible 100).

There were 25 applications that scored at 75 points or higher, and 4 applications that scored at 70 points, for a total of 29 applications. To fill the class with 32 seats, the 65 point score group and higher was the selection group. However, there were 3 seats left to fill, and 11 applications that scored 65 points. The individuals who scored 65 points and were also alternates last year were given priority.  Alternate numbers follow in order of score groups with random assignment for ties, and priority given within that score group if there was a previous application.



 

NEXT Public Information session:  WEDNESDAY, May 10th, 2017  at 6-7pm in Room NU 101 

Notice:  The selection process for the generic ADN program is now based on a Multi-Criteria Screening Process as defined in AB 1559 (Berryhill) and California Education Code Section 78261. This law provides for a community college registered nursing program that determines the number of applicants to the program exceeds its capacity, to admit students using a multi-criteria screening process. For your information, the competitive multi-criterion score for Phase 1 for the immediate past applicant pool was 45 points, and for Phase 2 was 75 points. The competitive score is based on the top 40% of applicant scores, and so may vary from year to year.

Please review the RN Program Summary and Multicriterion Selection Worksheet links for more information, and plan to attend a public information session!

 

 


After Phase 2 scoring which added ATI TEAS results to the Phase 1 scores, there were 51 applications remaining. Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for the applicant pool was 75 points.


There were 25 applications that scored at 75 points or higher, and 4 applications that scored at 70 points, for a total of 29 applications. To fill the class with 32 seats, the 65 point score group and higher was the selection group. However, there were 3 seats left to fill, and 11 applications that scored 65 points. The individuals who scored 65 points and were also alternates last year were given priority. Alternate numbers follow in order of score groups with random assignment for ties, and priority given within that score group if there was a previous application.


After Phase 2 scoring which added ATI TEAS results to the Phase 1 scores, there were 51 applications remaining. Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for the applicant pool was 75 points.


There were 25 applications that scored at 75 points or higher, and 4 applications that scored at 70 points, for a total of 29 applications. To fill the class with 32 seats, the 65 point score group and higher was the selection group. However, there were 3 seats left to fill, and 11 applications that scored 65 points. The individuals who scored 65 points and were also alternates last year were given priority. Alternate numbers follow in order of score groups with random assignment for ties, and priority given within that score group if there was a previous application.


After Phase 2 scoring which added ATI TEAS results to the Phase 1 scores, there were 51 applications remaining. Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for the applicant pool was 75 points.


There were 25 applications that scored at 75 points or higher, and 4 applications that scored at 70 points, for a total of 29 applications. To fill the class with 32 seats, the 65 point score group and higher was the selection group. However, there were 3 seats left to fill, and 11 applications that scored 65 points. The individuals who scored 65 points and were also alternates last year were given priority. Alternate numbers follow in order of score groups with random assignment for ties, and priority given within that score group if there was a previous application.