Donor Appreciation


Related Links

Free viewers are required for some of the attached documents.
They can be downloaded by clicking on the icons below.

Acrobat Reader Flash Player Windows Media Player Microsoft Silverlight Word Viewer Excel Viewer PowerPoint Viewer

 

I loved being an MCCSN student! The faculty and staff were extremely supportive and went beyond their duties to make sure we were learning and performing at our maximum potential.

Gabriela Cerna

MCCSN Graduated 2019

Stellar Schooltop_ranked_badge_small_2019

Top School Rankings

 

 NEXT APPLICATION CYCLE Fall 2019 (online link):  

Opens September 9th (at 8 am) and closes September 30th (at 3 pm). 

for cohort entering fall 2020 

 

The Maurine Church Coburn School of Nursing at Monterey Peninsula College (MCCSN) offers the associate of science degree leading to RN licensure. The program is offered in partnership with Montage Health. 

The School of Nursing is approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing (BRN), most recent re-approval visit March 2017. The associate degree program is also accredited by the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN) through fall 2019.

Comments about the program may be directed to these agencies at the following addresses:

California Board of Registered Nursing    

  • Board of Registered Nursing
    PO Box 944210
    Sacramento, CA 94244-2100  (www.rn.ca.gov)   
  • Phone: (916) 322-3350

ACEN Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing  (next site visit is scheduled Sep. 25-27, 2019)

NOTE:  The ACEN visiting team will be on campus to receive public comment on THURSDAY September 26th, 2019 from 4 PM - 5 PM in Room NU 101. All interested members of the public are welcome to attend. Written comments may be sent directly to ACEN and must be received by September 12th, 2019. See the "ACEN Accreditation" related link on this webpage for more details.

PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSIONS: See calendar of events

Program Outcomes for cohort entering fall 2019:   At the end of the program of study at the Maurine Church Coburn School of Nursing, graduates are able to

  • provide safe and effective nursing care to patients in a variety of clinical settings
  • coordinate  activities as a   leader within  the  interdisciplinary healthcare team to advocate for patients and  communities.
  • integrate  concepts of growth and development  to enhance  patient-centered care for diverse and dynamic  patient  populations
  • formulate the plan of care to  incorporate evidence-based practice
  • utilize technology to effectively communicate, manage knowledge, prevent errors and support decision making

><><><><><><><>

 Scoring results for the class entering Fall 2019:  The Phase 2 competitive score was 80 points out of a possible 100. To fill the class with 32 students, the actual select score was 75 points out of a possible 100.  Tied scores were settled by random selection with preference given to those who had applied in a previous cycle.

 ><><><><><><><>

 Questions??  Call us at 831-646-4258  or 831-646-3025

 ><><><><><><><>

Notice:  The selection process for the generic ADN program is now based on a Multi-Criteria Screening Process as defined in AB 548 and California Education Code Section 78261. This law provides for a community college registered nursing program that determines the number of applicants to the program exceeds its capacity, to admit students using a multi-criteria screening process. For your information, the competitive multi-criterion score for Phase 1 for the immediate past applicant pool (2017) was 50 points, and for Phase 2 was 80 points. The competitive score is based on the top 40% of applicant scores, and so may vary from year to year. Students from the 75 point group have been selected from the alternate list as seats have opened.   

 Please review the Program Information Summary and Multi-criterion Selection Worksheet links for more information. 

 

 


After Phase 2 scoring which added ATI TEAS results to the Phase 1 scores, there were 51 applications remaining. Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for the applicant pool was 75 points.


There were 25 applications that scored at 75 points or higher, and 4 applications that scored at 70 points, for a total of 29 applications. To fill the class with 32 seats, the 65 point score group and higher was the selection group. However, there were 3 seats left to fill, and 11 applications that scored 65 points. The individuals who scored 65 points and were also alternates last year were given priority. Alternate numbers follow in order of score groups with random assignment for ties, and priority given within that score group if there was a previous application.


After Phase 2 scoring which added ATI TEAS results to the Phase 1 scores, there were 51 applications remaining. Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for the applicant pool was 75 points.


There were 25 applications that scored at 75 points or higher, and 4 applications that scored at 70 points, for a total of 29 applications. To fill the class with 32 seats, the 65 point score group and higher was the selection group. However, there were 3 seats left to fill, and 11 applications that scored 65 points. The individuals who scored 65 points and were also alternates last year were given priority. Alternate numbers follow in order of score groups with random assignment for ties, and priority given within that score group if there was a previous application.


After Phase 2 scoring which added ATI TEAS results to the Phase 1 scores, there were 51 applications remaining. Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for the applicant pool was 75 points.


There were 25 applications that scored at 75 points or higher, and 4 applications that scored at 70 points, for a total of 29 applications. To fill the class with 32 seats, the 65 point score group and higher was the selection group. However, there were 3 seats left to fill, and 11 applications that scored 65 points. The individuals who scored 65 points and were also alternates last year were given priority. Alternate numbers follow in order of score groups with random assignment for ties, and priority given within that score group if there was a previous application.