I loved being an MCCSN student! The faculty and staff were extremely supportive and went beyond their duties to make sure we were learning and performing at our maximum potential.

Gabriela Cerna

MCCSN Graduated 2019

Donor Appreciation


Related Links

Free viewers are required for some of the attached documents.
They can be downloaded by clicking on the icons below.

Acrobat Reader Download Acrobat Reader Flash Player Download Flash Player Windows Media Player Download Windows Media Player Microsoft Silverlight Download Microsoft Silverlight Word Viewer Download Word Viewer Excel Viewer Download Excel Viewer PowerPoint Viewer Download PowerPoint Viewer

ACEN-Seal-Color-Web_SmallStellar Schooltop_ranked_badge_small_2019

 

Top School Rankings

 Application Cycle Update 2/24/2020:

Phase 1 letters will be mailed this afternoon. Those who were advanced to Phase 2 also received an email this morning at the email address listed on the application. Please follow the instructions and deadlines regarding TEAS.  Phase 2 letters will be sent in early April. 
There were a total of 158 applications processed during fall 2019; 133 of them were complete and qualified for the first-semester fall 2020 cohort. Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for this applicant pool was 55 points. There were 54 applicants who scored at 55 points or higher. Applicants who scored 50 points and who had also submitted a complete and qualified application during a previous application cycle were also forwarded to Phase 2, for a total of 73 applicants forwarded to Phase 2.  

 

The Maurine Church Coburn School of Nursing at Monterey Peninsula College (MCCSN) offers the associate of science degree leading to RN licensure. The program is offered in partnership with Montage Health. 

The School of Nursing is approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing (BRN), most recent re-approval visit March 2017. The associate degree program is also accredited by the Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN) through Fall 2019.

Comments about the program may be directed to these agencies at the following addresses:

California Board of Registered Nursing    

  • Board of Registered Nursing
    PO Box 944210
    Sacramento, CA 94244-2100  (www.rn.ca.gov)   
  • Phone: (916) 322-3350

ACEN Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing 

NOTE:  The ACEN team concluded their site visit on Sep. 27th, 2019. Stay tuned for the final report and updated status decision by July 2020.

PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSIONS: See calendar of events

Program Outcomes for cohort entering fall 2019:   At the end of the program of study at the Maurine Church Coburn School of Nursing, graduates are able to

  • provide safe and effective nursing care to patients in a variety of clinical settings
  • coordinate  activities as a   leader within  the  interdisciplinary healthcare team to advocate for patients and  communities.
  • integrate  concepts of growth and development  to enhance  patient-centered care for diverse and dynamic  patient  populations
  • formulate the plan of care to  incorporate evidence-based practice
  • utilize technology to effectively communicate, manage knowledge, prevent errors and support decision making

  Questions??  Call us at 831-646-4258  or 831-646-3025

 ><><><><><><><>

Notice of final selection:  The selection process for the generic ADN program is based on a Multi-Criteria Screening Process as defined in AB 548 and California Education Code Section 78261. This law provides that a community college registered nursing program that determines the number of applicants to the program exceeds its capacity, may admit students using a multi-criteria screening process.

For your information, the competitive multi-criterion score for Phase 1 for the immediate past applicant pool (fall 2018) was 50 points, and for Phase 2 was 80 points. The competitive score is based on the top 40% of applicant scores, and so may vary from year to year. Tied scores are settled by random selection with preference given to those who applied in a previous cycle. After all students/alternates accepted seats, the 75-point group was the final score group. A total of 3 alternates entered the class fall 2019.

 Please review the Program Information Summary and Multi-criterion Selection Worksheet links for more information. 

 

 


After Phase 2 scoring which added ATI TEAS results to the Phase 1 scores, there were 51 applications remaining. Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for the applicant pool was 75 points.


There were 25 applications that scored at 75 points or higher, and 4 applications that scored at 70 points, for a total of 29 applications. To fill the class with 32 seats, the 65 point score group and higher was the selection group. However, there were 3 seats left to fill, and 11 applications that scored 65 points. The individuals who scored 65 points and were also alternates last year were given priority. Alternate numbers follow in order of score groups with random assignment for ties, and priority given within that score group if there was a previous application.


After Phase 2 scoring which added ATI TEAS results to the Phase 1 scores, there were 51 applications remaining. Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for the applicant pool was 75 points.


There were 25 applications that scored at 75 points or higher, and 4 applications that scored at 70 points, for a total of 29 applications. To fill the class with 32 seats, the 65 point score group and higher was the selection group. However, there were 3 seats left to fill, and 11 applications that scored 65 points. The individuals who scored 65 points and were also alternates last year were given priority. Alternate numbers follow in order of score groups with random assignment for ties, and priority given within that score group if there was a previous application.


After Phase 2 scoring which added ATI TEAS results to the Phase 1 scores, there were 51 applications remaining. Using the multi-criterion selection scoring tool, the top 40% (competitive) score for the applicant pool was 75 points.


There were 25 applications that scored at 75 points or higher, and 4 applications that scored at 70 points, for a total of 29 applications. To fill the class with 32 seats, the 65 point score group and higher was the selection group. However, there were 3 seats left to fill, and 11 applications that scored 65 points. The individuals who scored 65 points and were also alternates last year were given priority. Alternate numbers follow in order of score groups with random assignment for ties, and priority given within that score group if there was a previous application.